Chicago Movie Analysis

Musicals are one of my favorite forms of entertainments. Watching the Academy Award winning film Chicago in class taught me to better understand movies, especially musicals. Understanding the film came from discussions of analyzing the cinematic, theatrical, and literary elements that combine to create meaning of Roxie’s story. Roxie’s role in the movie is portrayed as a person who wants to be in show business. She desperately wants to be loved by people and accepted by all. The only person who loves her, however, is her husband, Amos.  Amos is a quiet man who works hard as a mechanic and isn’t home till late in the day. Amos is rather content with his life differing from his wife, Roxie’s, aspiring goals.  All Roxie cares and talks about is a possible career as a vaudeville dancer. Roxie loves to be on stage to have people cheering her name. Without that she feels useless. She could not see herself committing to a blue collar job. Hence, Roxie felt that she was born to be a star. Seeing this movie several times now, I’ve picked up a few things I’d have never noticed the first time I watched the film. Zellweger’s character feels the need to be on everyone’s tongue, whether the gossip is good or bad. Roxie hates to be second best, and she would do whatever it took even if it meant killing a person or having sex with someone, whether boyfriend or husband. This movie seems to be filled with crooks who stop at nothing to get what they want. And even with the dark undertones of betrayal, greed, jealousy, murder, and revenge, the music and bright lights seem to divert the audience’s attention to the glorious big stage that is “show biz”.

Works Cited:

Chicago. Dir. Rob Marshall. Perf. Catherine Zeta-Jones, Richard Gere. 2002. DVD.

Comments

Collaborative paper: Sixties Social Standards

Film in the 1960′s portrayed changes in the social structures of
the era. From feminism to racial tensions, sixties films fueled the
fire of many arguments and kept tensions high as they brought forth
more debates and uncovered hidden truths. Musicals such as West Side
Story and Man of La Mancha portrayed the changing roles of women and
the presence of gangs. Horror films such as Night of the Living Dead
showed the change in morality and the change in racial tensions that
were so prevalent in the previous decades. There were many changes in
the social standards of the era, and sixties film portrayed it greatly.

For many years, women were thought of as weak. They were made to
seem like they needed protection and to be treated as damsels in
distress. Often women were viewed only as the needy counterparts to
their male companions. In the 1960′s, however, women became
independent, burning their bras and refusing to shave. They came
closer to being an equal counterpart to men, and they began resenting
the role taht they had played for hundreds of years.  Racial tensions
were a huge part of the 1960′s Civil Rights Movement. More and more
African American and Latin actors acted in major movies, and even
musicals were written to show the plight of the minorities.

West Side Story shows examples of the racial tensions that
plagued the 1960’s. In it, two west side Manhattan gangs of different
races fight over the same streets. The Jets are working class
Caucasians with little to do but fight (rumble) and rule the streets.
The Sharks are Puerto Ricans, new to the country, and looking for
their own turf to lay claim to. The two gangs fight intermittently
throughout the musical, and as the plot progresses the fights become
more brutal. This portrays the real-world increasing tensions as the
races spend more and more time together.  Although a problem in the
1960’s, these struggles were prevalent even in Shakespeare’s
day: “West Side Story created a Broadway sensation as a stunning
amalgamation of Shakespeare, musical theater, and the theme of street
gangs and violence among modern youths” (Mitchell).The musical beings
with a forbidden love and ends with a death. This is very common to
Romeo and Juliet, and although it is thought of in
dependently, the writers relied greatly on the compassion and depth
written into Romeo and Juliet to assist in making people realize the
meaning of West Side Story. with a death of an ex-gang member, and the
other gangsters realize that they have been in the wrong. This common
ground of acceptance is one of the greatest realizations of the 1960’s.

Man of La Mancha is a symbol of every woman’s need to be cared
for. It was the antithesis of the common thought of the 1960’s, but
Man of La Mancha proved that the need for chivalry a universal one.
In it, Alonso, (Don Quixote’s real name) meets a downtrodden ‘bar
maid’ who has little charm and no self esteem. Her name is Aldonza,
and she is rough and very capable of caring for herself.  Alonso sees
past her rough edges, and instead views her as a beautiful princess.
He sings to her, and for a short time she realizes that Alonso is
showing her the same compassion that every girl wants. She feels like
she matters, like she belongs somewhere. Alonso’s singing opened a
whole new world of ideas in her mind. Aldonza soon begins to share
Alonso’s delusions, and lives in his happy world for a short time:
That night, Aldonza is raped, and our chivalrous hero vows to take
control and gain revenge for the defloration of his beloved (Man of La
Mancha). He sings many songs and ca
lms the lady, but the magic has already run out. She no longer
believes that she is worthy. This greatly depicts the belief that most
women in the sixties had that a man could not make you successful, but
I feel that for a moment, Aldonza felt human. That is something that
every girl wants.

Night of the Living Dead brought sixties counter cultural values
into the horror movie. Though it was the first movie to do this, it
was the only one whose potent social commentary still reverberates
today. Shot in grainy black and white by director George Romero, Night
of the Living Dead is a claustrophobic, low-budget, horror film about
a group of people holed up in a farmhouse as they fend off flesh-
eating ghouls. Romero has said in interviews that the ghouls
represented a new society overtaking the old one, mirroring the social
and cultural shifts that were occurring during the sixties as a
younger generation was rejecting the values and mores of its parent
(Thehorrorblog). This statement couldn’t be blatant than in the
Hollywood system, a bloated wreck of its past glories that was being
dismantled by younger filmmakers, such as Romero, who were introducing
new stories and attitudes into the theaters. Night of the Living Dead
takes the conventions of the horror genre a
nd turns them on its head. Unlike other horror films, the heroine
Barbara, played by Judith O’Dea, is a catatonic wreck after her
brother is murdered by one of the zombies during a visit to a local
cemetery. The two middle class characters, Harry and Helen Cooper,
represented the older generation, stuck in its ways and unable to cope
with a changing society. But the most progressive aspect of the film
was making its leading hero a black man (GoreGirl blog). Played by
Duane Jones, Ben was uncompromising and resourceful as he fought off
the zombies. What made Ben such a revolutionary character was the fact
that in the past black men were always portrayed as cowardly and
inefficient, whose bulging eyes and lazy demeanor were counterpoints
to the white heroes who came in to rescue the day. While Ben’s
struggle for survival would turn out to be ill-fated, his battle
against the zombies and the belligerence of Harry Cooper, who fought
against his decisions every step of the way, s
howed him to be a man of conscious, decision, forthrightness, and
strength. Ben’s death at the end of the film was shocking in so much
that heroes in horror pictures almost always prevail against evil. But
here, Romero seems to suggest that the heroism Ben exhibits is that
most shocking and therefore far more frightening than the zombies
terrorizing the countryside (Horror Film History). This last social
comment pushes Night of the Living Dead above the usual grind house
fare of gore and blood. Night of the Living Dead spelled a dawning of
new political and social realities that would overtake American
values, sometimes ending in the deaths of those who fought and
struggled for those new realities, but opening ways for changes that
would redefine America in the coming decades.

Sixties films show us how the social standards of the eras before
the 1960′s changed, and how they continued changing through the era.
Horror films and musicals showed racial tensions fly away, and also
how women’s roles changed drastically. Films from that decade are
almost like documentaries on the ebb and flow of roles of people.
Those roles are still changing today.

Works Cited:

Bradford, Wade. “Review of Man of La Mancha – Musical of Don Quixote.”
Plays / Drama. Web. 12 Feb. 2010.
http://plays.about.com/od/reviews/fr/lamancha.htm.

“Horror Film History.” Web. 23 Feb 2010. <http://www.horrorfilmhistory.com/index.php?pageID=1960s>.

Mitchell, Charles P. “West Side Story 1961.” Pop Culture Universe.
Greenwood Publishing Group, 2004. Web. 5 Feb. 2010.
http://pop.greenwood.com.libnet.swosu.edu/document.aspx?id=GR2037-
1331&q=west%20side%20story.

“Night of the Living Dead – The Dungeon Review!” [Weblog entry.] Gore Girl. 26 Oct. 2009. (http://goregirl.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/night-of-the-living-dead-the-dungeon-review/). 23 Feb. 2010.

“Top Ten – Richard Crouse” [Weblog entry.] The Horror Blog. 26 Oct. 2009. (http://thehorrorblog.com/). 23 Feb. 2010.

Check out the blogs in my blogroll for more information.

Comments (1)

Blog Analysis: Horror Films in the Sixties

A girl is running through the woods screaming, tripping and calling for help. A tall man is chasing after her with a big shiny knife. She falls and he looms over her as eerie music plays in the background. She lets out a high pitched scream as he plunges the knife into her. It is a scene that movie fans are very familiar with, the classic horror cliché. While the purpose of horror movies has always been to scare and shock the audience by reflecting all of our greatest fears; movies have evolved with time, becoming more gory and twisted with each new movie released. During the sixties, two different sub-genres of horror flicks were born: zombie movies and psychological thrillers. Both were immensely popular. The following blogs explain how horror movies in the sixties have paved the way for films today.

The 1960’s movie “Psycho,” was undoubtedly a groundbreaking and revolutionary film. Goregirl’s blog aided me in the research for additional details about Hitchcock’s film. Her black and orange-themed layout reminded me of Halloween. She also adds a lot of pictures and clips of horror movies to help give writers an idea of what she is referring to in every scene. Regarding the movie, however, “Psycho” was produced by Alfred Hitchcock and is often referred to as the “mother of the modern horror movie” (Zombievamp) as it is the first horror movie that received so much success. The layout of Zombievamp’s blog is filled with horror clips of the movies tying into the writer’s blog. The pictures help give a more detailed feel to what the reader is learning about each movie. The blogger also helps by tagging and adding references to most of his added details which deemed to be very useful for my research. Horror films strive to elicit fear, horror and terror responses from viewers. “Psycho” fits into the horror genre as it successfully accomplishes all of these three things. “Psycho” is seen by many horror fans as the ultimate horror film. Hitchcock plays with the idea of identity and involvement. The viewer is expected to feel drawn into the world of Norman Bates. The suggestion is that the viewer’s identity is not as important as his or her emotional involvement in the plot. The film universalizes the idea of monstrosity in each individual. It mirrors the audience’s wickedness and guilt by means of the ordinary and unassuming Norman. The implication is that everybody has a dark side. The monster therefore appears to have moved closer and closer with the development of the horror film. And now it is inside. Or now its existence is recognized. The monster is no longer something that looks hideous. Instead he or she is as human-looking as everyone else (Thehorrorblog). Thehorrorblog’s black and white layout seem to represent the old time feel of a classic movie while explaining in different reasons how influential the movie “Psycho” impacted the horror industry. The writer claims she still gets “creeped out in the shower” since watching the movie. The posts in the blog include various top ten lists of horror films in different categories in which case the writer explains that horror movies usually include a central villain. They also use a variety of clever techniques to create and maintain suspense. Music, graphics and dramatic irony play a very crucial part in this. ScienceDaily explains there are a couple reasons why the public loves horror films, “the first is that the person is not actually afraid, but excited by the movie. The second explanation is that they are willing to endure the terror in order to enjoy a great sense of relief at the end”. Movies like Psycho inspired more films like the Zodiac and Silence of the Lambs which binds the elements of the crime and horror genres.

Zombie movies, on the other hand, were usually produced as low budget films that weren’t as scary as Hitchcock’s “Psycho”. In legendary director George A. Romero’s film, Night of the Living Dead is a cheapie horror film about an unexpected radiation that raises the dead. When this happens, a microcosm in Pennsylvania has to battle flesh-eating zombies in Romero’s landmark zombie film. Romero’s grainy black-and-white cinematography and casting of locals emphasize the terror lurking in ordinary life; as in Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds (1963), Romero’s victims are not attacked because they did anything wrong, and the randomness makes the attacks all the more horrifying. Nothing holds the key to salvation, either, whether it’s family, love, or law. Topping off the existential dread is Romero’s “then-extreme use of gore, as zombies nibble on limbs and viscera” (Thehorrorblog). By 1979, the film grossed millions of dollars and inspired a cycle of apocalyptic splatter films like The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974), and set the standard for finding horror in the mundane. However cheesy the film may look, few horror movies reach a conclusion as desolately unsettling.

Works Cited:

“Let Sleeping Corpses Lie (Jorge Grau, 1974)” [Weblog entry.] Decapitated Zombie Vampire Bloodbath. 7 Feb. 2009. (http://zombievamp.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2010-02-06T12%3A10%3A00-06%3A00&max-results=2). 23 Feb. 2010.

LoBrutto, Vincent.”Dark Side of American Cinema.” Becoming Film Literate: The Art and Craft of Motion Pictures. 2005. Pop Culture Universe. 23 Feb. 2010.

“Night of the Living Dead – The Dungeon Review!” [Weblog entry.] Gore Girl. 26 Oct. 2009. (http://goregirl.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/night-of-the-living-dead-the-dungeon-review/). 23 Feb. 2010.

“Top Ten – Richard Crouse” [Weblog entry.] The Horror Blog. 26 Oct. 2009. (http://thehorrorblog.com/). 23 Feb. 2010.

University of Chicago Press Journals. “Why Do People Love Horror Movies? They Enjoy Being Scared.” ScienceDaily 31 July 2007. 24 February 2010 <http://www.sciencedaily.com­ /releases/2007/07/070725152040.htm>.

Bibliography:

“Horror Vs. Psychological Thriller/Drama” [Weblog entry.] Paradise of Horror. 10 Jan. 2010. (http://www.paradiseofhorror.com/2010/01/horror-vs-psychological-thrillerdrama.html). 23 Feb. 2010.

“Horror Film History.” Web. 23 Feb 2010. <http://www.horrorfilmhistory.com/index.php?pageID=1960s>.

Comments

Video Response: Audrey Hepburn

Throughout the nineteen sixties, fashion thrived upon cautious simplicity. And no actress epitomized the industry ideal better than Audrey Hepburn, a legendary brunette beauty that rapidly became one of the most influential style icons of our time. Perhaps it was her elegance and wit that enraptured america; or that little black dress and those long white gloves in “Breakfast at Tiffany’s” she had every woman yearning for. Perhaps it was both. But regardless of the details, it was the sole, overarching fact that, not unlike fellow sixties style icon Twiggy, Hepburn kept it simple. She loved clean lines and clothes that emphasized her tall and slim physique – one that greatly differed from those of the much more curvaceous actresses in the sixties. This did not, however, stop Hepburn from emphasizing her waist as much as any other. She used cinchers and belts, pencil skirts and body-hugging mini dresses (Audrey Hepburn Style). Everything she wore quickly rose to the top of the fashion industry.

But nothing became quite as eminent as the petite black dresses Hepburn displayed on the big screen. Women from all over the world use this little closet staple for gala’s, black tie events, weddings and more, paying homage to Hepburn’s unique sense of style; a style reliant on simplicity. Fashion in the sixties was all about simple body-accentuating designs paired with eye-catching accessories. A combination that resulted in what might be called modest beauty. Hepburn almost managed to pair capri pants with fabulous blouses and long trench coats – and ever since, capri pants have been a common wardrobe staple. She loved ballet flats and wore them regardless of whether she was wearing dresses, pants, or capris. Her style made chic fashion simpler than ever and easy to put together and wear. And as much as she loved wearing feminine clothing, Audrey sported menswear flawlessly. She pulled off the men’s inspired look with but simple feminine twists to her outfits (Audrey Hepburn Style). After her movie Roman Holiday (which rocketed her to fame in acting and fashion) women everywhere were copying her short haircut, full skirts, cinched waists and button-down shirts. Hepburn even made turtlenecks and trench coats striking in her simple silhouetted outfits and finished off her look with the perfect handbag.

Her success was surprising in a time enthralled with the strikingly curvaceous stars Marilyn Monroe and Elizabeth Taylor. But Hepburn knew how to accentuate her lean, slender figure. She wore not what appealed to the latest trend but instead to her body type. In doing so, everything she wore complimented her youthful figure. Hepburn’s simple yet glamorous style and her classic nature still has surprising influence over our fashion choices today. As short haircuts grew in popularity, she among other famous actresses such as Elizabeth Taylor adopted the “bubble” haircut. The arrival of hair products and rollers made hairstyling easier and allowed much more stylistic innovation in curls and hair-dos. Hepburn opted for very minimal makeup shades and chose only to enhance her features with structured eyebrows and eyeliner to emphasize her eyes. Hepburn was a role model in fashion who, unlike most, chose not to blindly follow fashion trends but instead to wear what was comfortable and fit for her body (How to Dress Like Audrey Hepburn). Most women try too hard to highlight their beauty, but Hepburn’s simple and modest message in fashion inspired even elaborate fashion designers to rock simple designs with a woman’s unique figure rather than having the outfit make the woman wearing it.

For more information on Audrey Hepburn, visit this<a href="http://womensfashion.suite101.com/article.cfm/audrey_hepburn_fashion_tips">site</a> For more information of sixties film, visit my lovely classmate Katie's<a href="http://henrykcomp2.edublogs.org/">blog</a>

Works cited

“Audrey Hepburn Style.” n. pag. Web. 15 Feb 2010. http://www.famous-women-and-beauty.com/audrey-hepburn-style.html.

“How to Dress Like Audrey Hepburn.” n. pag. Web. 15 Feb 2010. http://www.ehow.com/how_4489383_dress-like-audrey-hepburn.html.

Thomas, Pauline. “1950s Fashion Glamour.” n. pag. Web. 15 Feb 2010. <http://www.fashion-era.com/1950s_glamour.htm>.

Bibliography

“Audrey Hepburn winning an Oscar® for “Roman Holiday” Oscars Award Clip.  You Tube. 15 Feb. 2010.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-vR7D21wqI.

“Breakfast at Tiffany’s” Movie trailer.  You Tube. 15 Feb. 2010.  <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urQVzgEO_w8>.

Comments

The History of Smiley Faces

A powerful symbol requires exactness, simplicity, and most importantly, as little creativity as possible. It must give the white-collar worker who lands but a glance an instant reaction no different from the North Korean soldier with no access to the outside world. Now, clearly the latter amasses no concern in a business approach to conceiving an effective symbol – but if a symbol can achieve such a universal response, then its power is evident. There is no better example of such a symbol than the Smiley. Its sheer lack of creativity and its simplification of human expression makes it “powerfully archetypal;” an “image of a happy face that resembles the sun.”

This sheer innocence could only be produced in the 1960s. The hippie movement had just begun, and with “ideas of freedom, hedonism, and experimentation” hitting the “American masses”, it was the “perfect feelgood symbol.” And so the counter-culture movement quickly carried into the mainstream; it was found on anything from T-shirts to tea trays. The Smiley symbolizes happiness – and happiness is the best indicator of perfection. It is the highest goal, the ultimatum every individual seeks. And what the Smiley symbolized it inspired. Laughter is not necessarily the only contagious emotion (though it is definitely the most). When one listens to a melancholic song they become depressed; when one watches a horror film they become scared; when one views a bright face smiling right at them they smile back. The Smiley not only represented happiness, it also inherently spread it. Or so goes the theory. Many businesses pasted Smileys in their office walls hoping to perk up their employees for a cheap price. But how could a symbol that embodies the counter-culture movement so perfectly still be around today when the movement itself has long since been extinguished? By changing what it symbolizes, of course.

Celebration of pure and innocent joy grew difficult in the face of the rather sobering Vietnam War. The violence, chaos and corruption understandably lead to darker thinking. A new perspective of the Smiley was inevitable. To twist something once considered a sort of perfection into its antithesis is sure to be foreboding. Now consider for a moment that happiness is one the most convincing consequences of achieving perfection. The Smiley not only infers perfection, but it encompasses something even more desirable, happiness itself. Making the symbol feel false and mocking would be perhaps even more powerful than the Smiley’s original intent. Alan Moore saw this and did just that in The Watchmen:

Written during 1985 and published in 1986, Watchmen used the Smiley as a visual metaphor for a narrative that examines guilt, failure, megalomania and compromise with a corrupt power structure. All is not well beneath the idealised superhero surface, as the novel spirals into an existential crisis of betrayal, mass extinction, the transience of human existence. (Savage)

All very relevant themes during the Vietnam War. The United States was once again playing the police, exhibiting clear megalomania. The public swiftly realized they were doing more harm than good, and guilt began to boil. Realizations of the need to compromise with a corrupt world soon brought feelings of failure when the United States had officially risen the white flag. It was the first war the United States had ever lost and its impact on the morale of the country was profound. The Smiley grew into something beyond its original intent and managed to stay relevant in a rapidly changing country. Yet this is still within the confines of the counter-culture movement. It took yet another form in its everlasting struggle. The Smiley was digitized.

It went from a pure symbol to a deep metaphor and now it has transformed into hollow language. The Smiley has “swept the digital world via emoticons, suggesting various moods from confused to secret-telling, sarcastic to psychotic.” The Smiley and its many variants have become simply another way for humans to express themselves. That’s not to say the Smiley is no longer capable of its previous 1960s innocence or meaning, but it sadly requires much more context than it once did. If insisted that the Smiley must still be inherently symbolic, it would be only of the severe convenience we find ourselves stranded in today – otherwise, the Smiley is no longer any more profound than a colon, dash and parenthesis.

Works Cited:

Savage, John. “A Design for Life.” Guardian (2009): 4. Web. 5 Feb 2010. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2009/feb/21/smiley-face-design-history>.

Comments (3)

WWII Pin-Up Queens: My Picture Response

141929

WWII Pin-Up

WWII Pin-Up

Although the “pin-up” gets its name from the act of display it encourages, which might apply to any mass produced and widely distributed image, the term commonly identifies a more narrow category of pictures, from glossy portraits of Hollywood stars to Playboy’s monthly magazines. With an even tighter focus, “pinups” usually designate pictures of pretty girls wearing skimpy bathing suits, exotic lingerie, or sometimes even less, in “sexy” images that only the most puritanical viewer would now condemn as obscene. The term’s most evocative use recalls the drawn, painted, or photographed representations of idealized, all-American femininity produced in the decades surrounding World War II. While the pin-up has obvious precursors in French postcards from the turn of the twentieth century, and late variants like the annual Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue, the form is exemplified by the odd balance of eroticism, innocence, healthiness, and patriotism found in commercial images of women produced between the 1920s and 1960s.

Viewed within a large frame, the pin-up is a species of the portrait, yanked down off the walls of exclusive galleries and museums and posted in ordinary gas stations and poolhalls. Generated by the development and proliferation of inexpensive processes of photography, lithography, and color printing, the pin-up contributed to more democratic, and perhaps inevitably more vulgar, understandings of celebrity, voyeurism, consumption, and eroticism, closing the gap in taste and appreciation between classical nudes and burlesque showgirls. Although pictures of prominent theatrical performers were common by the turn of the twentieth century, the pin-up thrived as a component of the film industry, as talented photographers like Clarence Sinclair Bull, George Hurrell, Eugene Robert Richee, and Ted Allen were exclusively employed by the Hollywood studios to idealize their most precious commodities, the movie stars. Much of the residual glamour of Hollywood’s golden age certainly derives from the striking black and white images these photographers produced of screen celebrities like Jean Harlow, Louise Brooks, Greta Garbo, and Joan Crawford.

Preceding the Hollywood dream factory, commercial illustrators and graphic artists such as Charles Dana Gibson and Howard Chandler Christy had already glorified the American girl in the pages of popular illustrated magazines and helped define the modern ideal of femininity that would eventually coalesce as the jazz age’s flapper. From the 1920s onward, popular magazine, calendar, and advertising artists like Antonio Vargas, Gil Elvgren, Earl Moran, Zoe Mozert, and George Petty produced hundreds of “cheesecake” images of sleek, flawless, all-American femininity marked by the “tease” of blowing skirts and sheer fabric rather than by explicit nude display. ByWorld War II, the Vargas girl and Hollywood pin-ups like Betty Grable and Rita Hayworth came to represent not only American femininity but the very values American soldiers were defending. As the French film critic Andre Bazin later recognized, “A wartime product created for the benefit of the American soldiers swarming to a long exile at the four corners of the world, the pin-up girl soon became an industrial product, subject to well-fixed norms and as stable in quality as peanut butter or chewing gum.” (The Pin Up Files)

After the war, the classic, scantily clad pin-up continued to thrive until an underground tradition was brought into the mainstream in 1955 by Hugh Hefner’s Playboy magazine, which provided an entire “Playboy philosophy” of robust, healthy heterosexuality to justify its monthly inclusion of a nude Playmate at the heart of each issue. Playboy redefined the pin-up by shifting the earlier period’s emphasis on long legs to an all-but-exclusive fascination with large breasts.

In the late 1940s Irving Klaw and his sister Paula, the owners of Movie Star News, a New York shop that sold Hollywood movie stills, began producing their own photographs of women in fetish gear and bondage poses to satisfy the requests of their more discriminating customers. Among Klaw’s models, a young woman with jet-black bangs named Betty (or Bettie) Page quickly became a customer favorite, and decades after she disappeared from sight, Page became a cult icon among comic book fans and collectors of 1950s kitsch, perhaps because she so effectively summarized the cultural contradictions of the post-war period: Page, like most pin-ups, was a pretty girl-next-door type, but she also wore stiletto heels and leather bondage gear. In retrospect, Betty Page seemed the ideal pin-up of a period that produced both the McCarthy witchhunts and the Kinsey Reports on human sexuality.

Although the pin-up has commonly been assumed to be a form depicting women for an audience of heterosexual males, the homosexual tradition of pin-ups has a lengthy history as well: in fact, one of the young artists who regularly contributed his drawings to Physique Pictorial, who called himself Tom of Finland, would eventually emerge as the gay Vargas, exaggerating the features of his muscular young men just as the earlier artist idealized his female figures (The History of Pin-Up Art). Celebrated in later decades, the photographs of the post-war period, like Betty Page’s bondage pictures, revise simple and nostalgic stereotypes of the era’s conservative values and sexual inhibitions. The legacy of the classic Hollywood pin-up survives in the work of contemporary celebrity photographers like Matthew Rolston, Annie Liebovitz, Bruce Weber, and Herb Ritts, whose subjects are as likely to be rock musicians or “supermodels” as movie stars. Posters of attractive women in bathing suits or underwear, from Farrah Fawcett or Madonna to the Spice Girls, have also never disappeared from adolescent bedroom walls. But the classic pin-up, save for athriving network of nostalgic collectors, seems to have certainly succumbed to, on the one hand, feminism’s largely effective redefinition of women as social subjects rather than simply sexual objects and, on the other hand, the increased availability of hard-core pornography, whose blatant meanings no longer encourage the slightly muted eroticism essential to the classic pin-up.

Works Cited:

Bazin, Andre. “Entomology of the Pin-Up Girl.” What is Cinema? Vol. 2. Translated by Hugh Gray. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1971.

“The Pinup in History.” Web. Jan. 26 2010. http://kentsteine.com/history.htm.

Gabor, Mark. The Pin-Up: A Modest History. New York, Universe Books, 1972.

Martignette, Charles G., and Louis K. Meisel. The Great American Pin-Up. Cologne, Germany, Taschen, 1996.

“The History of Pin-Up Art.” Web. 25 Jan. 2010. http://www.arthistoryarchive.com/arthistory/pinupart/

Comments (1)

Intro- Fashion in the 60′s: A Response

The 60′s were a time of change and challenge. They brought hippies, space age, folk music, and the Beatles. Women’s skirts got shorter, men’s hair got longer, and everyone talked about love.  The 60’s were characterized by the feeling that a break with the past had been achieved. Clothes, furniture, and products all looked newer, brighter, and more fun.  The swinging 60′s were at their height. Women’s hemlines were very short. Fashion in the 60′s tended to encourage exhibitionism. Miniskirts, bold colors, and see through dresses were all geared to showing off women’s bodies, and on rare occasion men’s bodies. Gaudy accessories such as rings, earrings, and fold chain belts were used often as embellishments.  For women, there were long flowing skirts in intricate cotton prints. For both sexes, Indian Kafthans, headbands, “love beads”, bell and bell – bottomed hipsters were the big thing. Hipsters were unisex trousers that rested on the hips rather than the waist. A wide belt with a heavy buckle was added. The light weight ski-pants of the 50′s gradually gave way to flares, bell bottoms, and loon pants, bright colors, novel materials, chunky rings, and sports cars were all part of the 60′s look. In the early 60′s, the teenager’s world was suddenly hit by the rock- n- roll of phenomenon of the Beatles. Teens idolized rock stars and let their hair grow long and wore bright, wild colored clothes. Leather offered great opportunities for self – expression. The clothes were influenced by stage performers.
The sixties were a reflection of the power of Jimi Hendrix, the Beatles, and the Rolling Stones. It was the beginning of the fashion reversal. Some pop groups in particular, the Rolling Stones, cultivated a rebellious attitude that was reflected in their unconventional, scruffy clothing. Strict rules dictated what was worn and when. Casuals for wearing during the day were very distinct from formal evening wear. Fashion in the 1960′s was far, far off from the decade that preceded it. The sixties was all about skin, sex and drugs. Now even though it was a time for the hippies to peace out with their pipes and for girls to run around in almost nothing out came a fashion icon whose timeless style still has her revered today.
Jackie Kennedy, Due in part to her French ancestry, Jackie had always felt a bond with France which was reinforced by her schooling there. This was a love that would later be reflected in many aspects of her life, such as the menus she chose for White House state dinners and her taste in clothing. She spoke French, Spanish, and Italian fluently, and she preferred her name to be pronounced in the French fashion. She had a strong preference for French haute couture clothes designers, but these clothes were expensive, and she feared wearing them might be perceived as disloyalty to American designers. She often got around such restrictions by having American dressmakers like Chez Ninon in New York copy or adapt contemporary French designs for her. For her state wardrobe, she chose the Hollywood designer Oleg Cassini. During her days as First Lady, she would become a fashion icon domestically and internationally. (Wikipedia)
Now back to the sex, drugs and rock and rolling style of the sixties. Edie Sedgwick. In 1964, Sedgwick moved to New York to pursue a career in modeling. She appeared in Time, LIFE and Vogue between 1963 and 1965. The editor in chief of Vogue, Diana Vreeland, called her an exemplar of the era’s youth culture. She became Warhol’s Girl of the Year during 1965 when she accompanied him everywhere in the New York social scene. During this period the pair would often dress alike, and Sedgwick frequently called herself Mrs. Warhol. The friendship did not last beyond 1966 when Warhol and Sedgwick made an acrimonious public split. (Wikipedia) Twiggy an obvious choice for the sixties fashion, seeing as she was the leading model of the era.

Works Cited:

Barol, B. Leonard E, A. “Anatomy of a fad.” Newsweek. Summer/Fall90. Academic Search Complete. 25 Jan. 2010. Http://libnet.swosu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=9006251126&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Break out your bell-bottoms: From Madonna to Main Street, groovy ‘60s fashions are back.” People. 28 Jan. 1991. 25 Jan. 2010. Academic Search Complete. Http://libnet.swosu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=9102111791&site=ehost-live&scope=site.

Bibliography:

Fifties Web. “1960′s Fashions.” Web.  25 January 2010. http://www.fiftiesweb.com/fashion/sixties-fashion-w.htm.

Wikipedia. “Edie Sedgwick.” Web. 25 Jan. 2010. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edie_Sedgwick.

Wikipedia. “Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis.” Web. 25 Jan. 2010. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacqueline_Kennedy_Onassis.

Comments

Why It’s Hard Being a Girl Gamer

Being a girl gamer, it gives me a lot of unwanted attention. I used to play a lot of console games before getting into games that I could just access on my laptop while still enjoying my favorite first-person shooter games. Since joining the world of gaming communities, I’ve come to detest many of the stereotypes of female gamers. Most just use their sexuality to get attention while others prefer drawing attention to the more ‘cute’ genre of video games like Wii cooking games hence giving off the idea that girls shouldn’t be able to handle the gore and more strategy-involved games that most guys play.

Ironically, I never knew that being a female gamer was unusual until I started playing online and joining gaming communities. Prior to that, I just assumed that people gamed — all kinds of people. I had no preconceptions or stereotypes of who gamers were. I hope that one day we get back to that idea, though, not because of ignorance, but rather because it’s simple reality. I hate the division of girls and guys. But I love that things have changed and are changing because in the end we’re all just gamers.

Thanks for reading.

Comments (1)

Der erste Eintrag

Enjoying my day off from school. It’s nice to have a monday off once in a while. I could get used to it :) This is the third blog I’ve used, after using Xanga and Myspace. I’ve been meaning to make a Tumblr account for awhile but this should suffice for now since I’ll have to work to keep this blog up to date. I have high hopes for my group’s project on the sixties. I’ve always been interested in sixties fashion so it should pose no troubles for me to expound on the subject. Overall, I believe this semester in English is going to be an exciting one and I can’t wait to learn what I can from it.

Comments